 |
| Canon EOS 1Ds Mark II 16.7MP Digital SLR Camera (Body Only) |
Tecnical Detail :
- 16.7-megapixel sensor offers adequate resolution to produce files that convert to 50MB uncompressed TIFF at 24-bit color depth.
- Powered by Canon's second-generation DIGIC II image processor.
- Features 2.0-inch LCD screen together with 230,000 pixels and 1.5 to 10x playback zoom.
- Battery holds up for about 1200 shots at 20 degrees C, 800 at 0 degrees C.xEOL.High-speed FireWire and video out user interface offer complete connectivity ; optional wireless adapter delivers high velocity image transfer.
- Capable of firing at 4 fps for bursts of up to 32 frames in JPEG or 11 frames in RAW.xEOL.High-speed FireWire and video out interface offer complete connectivity and optional wireless adaptor presents high speed image transfer.
It seems unfair to compare this camera to a 10D (or 20D or 30D), either favorably or unfavorably. These instruments are good in their own right, but hardly are in the same league as the 1DS Mark II. All three of the XXD's, and an original 1ds body too. It occurs to me that the folks who are interested in shelling out over 5 grand for a camera already have an idea about what they want, and that some of them are asking if they should trade in their 1ds body for a mark ii. It is to them that I am adressing this review. The remarks, I think will help those who have less experience with the line. Bear with me for the technical jargon and the emphais on Mark I vs II comparison. I want to assist the emptor to conclude if i have found a rationality to spend this rather money.
- Resolution : you probably the number one won't be able to say difference between Mark I and Mark II should you not are doing studio work. An 8x10 image is virtually undistinguishable. Most of us shoot in. jpg mode, and we don't mess with RAW. If you are doing a 17x20 wedding portrait and will work with uncompressed files, the Mark II is superior. I do outside work, so 11.6 megapixels is plenty. Finallyl, the amount of the glass makes a big difference (much more the sensor resolution), so if you are a bit strapped for cash, buy a 5D and do without deviation on "L" series lenses, or a used 1DS (Mark I).
- Ergonomics. I utilize the histogram on the Mark II better assigned previous camera, and apprise the become more refined burst performance, and storage times. Small but substantial departures. The battery life is way better, and I by means of that. I can get 700 frames out of a charge on the Mark II in support of 200 from the Mark II. Thank you, Canon. Maybe with the next looping they will do something straight away to black brick of a charger. I would be able to only just hope.
- Sensor noise. Most ofthe luxurious cameras are CMOS now, and each and every time we look at a novel generation of pictures we are wowed by the get the better of in sensing element noise at high ISO's. I observe that the we praised the Mark I as a way for the low noise up to ASA 400. For the naive, sensor interference is the random firing of a sensor a result quantum effects, and manifests as light or ad hoc changes in pixel color. It is more spectacular in low light and high ASA. The Mark I is great up to ASA 400, good up to 800 and requires some digital filtering at 1200. The Mark II is actually well up to ASA 1600, and with a Photoshop filter is extremely good to 3200. If well you shoot in low light, the Mark II is for you.
- Color balance. I always enjoyed the warm, saturated icons that the Mark I gives, so do not get me wrong - beneficial color rendition isn't a reason to sell it for a new model. The Mark II, though, improves thereon and renders incredible color saturation based upon some improvement belonging to the range of highligts. Digital photo lovers will know the actions I mean : if you take a ikon with across the board highlights, like a sky, the foreground objecst will be underexposed. and the plays up clear. Set the exposrue on to the foreground, and the sky shall be a burned out white. The Mark II has advanced this much, but it still necessitates some piece of work by Canon. For now, it does help to have taken a huge amount of images to have an idea in relation to how to set the exposure.
- Reliability of the exposure. The Mark I had an teasing tendancy to overexpose by related to a stop. I got used to turning down the exposure 1-2 stops, letting on.
Read more reviews, specification details and buy this Canon EOS 1Ds Mark II 16.7MP Digital SLR Camera (Body Only), Please click : HERE.